Tuesday, November 20, 2012

Welcome to the Rundown!

A Radio program called "The Rundown" welcomes you to the world of Technology, where the host Samah Ali and Rundown producers, Caroline Elias and Mai El-Kady join us.



In this episode, the Rundown participants discussed the use of the various technology on campus as well as those emerging in today's tech-sphere. Topics ranged from the use of tablets, mobile phones and laptops, to what's hip and what's practical.

The second half of the segment introduces the Manager of Multimedia services at AUC's Center for Learning and Teaching, Ahmed Zorkani.

Special thanks to Ahmed Zorkani for attending the show, and Rundown producers Caroline Elias and Mai El-Kady.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Journal:
- We were not aware of what exactly was to be included other wise we would have been able to make it much content-richer.
- As a group, we did not adhere to our roles.
- We were supposed to have an interview with someone else from the CLT department at 2 PM but she cancelled on the same day at around 9:30 AM. to compromise, she provided us with some names of people to interview, to which we immediately hunted down and interviewed before our 10 AM class with Dr. Kim Fox.
- What we though was an accomplishment turned out to be of low quality. We were able to record everything beforehand but did not realize it lacked information.

Thank you and no, no more group work.

Sunday, November 11, 2012

Podcast: Save the World on Your Own Time



Picture taken from http://chronicle.com




Title of the book
Save the World on Your Own Time

Author
Stanley Fish

Excerpt taken from the "Introduction" section of the book.
An M-Audio was used in the recording of this podcast.







---------------

Script of podcast:


Not long ago, there was a time when I was responsible for a college with close to 30 departments and units, a budget of between 50 and 55 million dollars, 400 tenure-track faculty members, 700 staff, 10,000 undergraduate students, 2,000 graduate students, and 17 buildings. On any given day, I had to deal with disciplinary proceedings, tenure and promotion cases, faculty searches, chair searches, enrollment problems, fundraising, community outreach, alumni relations, public relations, curriculum reform, counteroffers, technology failures, space allocation, information systems, chair meetings, advisory committee meetings, deans council meetings, meetings with the provost, student complaints, faculty complaints, parent complaints, and taxpayer complaints. Office hours were 8:30 a.m. to whenever and often extended into the evenings and weekends. Vacations were few and far between. The pressure never relaxed.

When I left the job slightly more than five years, I felt that I had all the time (well, not quite all) in the world at my disposal, and for a while, spent it by trying to improve everyone I met, whether or not those I ministered to welcomed my efforts.

Although I was no longer a dean, I couldn’t shake the habit of being at the office every day, all day. Because I had nothing in particular to do, I roamed the halls looking for things that were wrong and I found them.

Stray pieces of furniture you couldn’t give away sat (or sprawled) in front of an office door. I stuck my head in and informed the occupant (why did he or she listen to me?) that the offending items must be removed by the end of the day.

Continuing down the halls, I found the panels separating two elevators festooned with announcements of lectures that took place two years ago. I proceeded to rip the leaflets down. Halfway through I decided that no one should be posting anything there anyway; so I removed every announcement, no matter how current, and, for good measure, I tore away the surface the announcements adhered to and threw all the thumbtacks and push-pins into the trash.

I noticed that someone had left a small carton of books, intended no doubt for impecunious graduate students who might have made good use of them. I didn’t care; into the trash they went, too.

But then it was time to go to class (I was still teaching), where, in an enclosed space, my students received the full force of my reforming zeal. I told them that I hadn’t the slightest interest in whatever opinions they might have and didn’t want to hear any.  I told them that while they may have been taught that the purpose of writing is to express oneself, the selves they had were not worth expressing, and that it would be good if they actually learned something. I told them that on basis of their performance so far they should sue their previous teachers for malpractice. I told them that anyone who says “I know it, but can’t explain it” would flunk the course.

After an hour and a half they escaped, except for one of them, who came to my office for further instruction. Although it was the end of the third week, she was still not quite sure about the structure of the basic English sentence. (This, of course, was a reflection on me, not her.) I took her through the subject and predicate slots and she seemed to understand who or what an actor is, but she couldn’t quite get the concept of the object of the action.

We were working with a sentence she had composed, “I threw the book into the garbage.” I asked her, “In that sentence what is the relationship between ‘threw’ and ‘book’?” She didn’t know. I tried again: “What is the impact on the object of the action?” She didn’t understand the question.

I decided that an illustration might do the trick; so I picked up a book on my desk and threw it. It hit a shelf of books a few feet away. She said nothing for a few seconds and then asked in a voice calmer than mine would have been, “Can I drop this course?” “Yes,” I answered (hoping to escape prosecution), and she left – the one person in the entire week who managed to get away.
---------------